Originally Posted by ud2
I like the wing appendage. The logo should be red and blue, they should not have changed it to all red and given in to all the complaints. The initial redesign was good IMO.
|
Originally Posted by longtimefan
The all red looks much better.
|
I agree that the one-color logo looks much better...whether it's red, or black (some times).
Re the white home uniforms....why no blue at all? Finally, re the red on blue letters or vice versa, almost unintelligible. About two years ago the U. of Miss played at the Arena. Their road uniforms were identical to Dayton's with one exception: Ole Miss was spelled out in blue trimmed in a fine white line. The white trim made all the difference in the world.
Now this isn't rocket science. Neil has eyes and must have read posts like this. Contrast is a very important element of design. And as is apparent to anyone who can see, our red-on-blue lettering or vice versa is seriously lacking in contrast. Same goes for the football uniforms.
That is the issue. I cannot imagine a sensible counter argument. So what's the matter with Neil's judgment? We've had the new unis for a few years now and the issue remains. Doesn't he care? Chris?